Lemley, patent scope and innovation in the software industry. Advisor 2004present, principles of the law of software contracts project. Lemley is a professor in the usa who has published many papers and articles on patents and software patents his articles contain useful information and he highlights interesting problems. Intellectual property in the new technological age 2018.
Lemley director program, faculty stanford law school. Lemley2 commentators have observed for years that patents do less good and cause more harm in the software industry than in other industries such as pharmaceuticals. How structural claim limitations can save software patents. Under the epc, and in particular its article 52, programs for computers. Chief points from responses to senator hironos questions. Everything you need to know about software patents vox. We argue that patent law needs some refinement if it is to promote rather than impede the growth of this new market, which is characterized by rapid sequential innovation, reuse and recombination of components, and strong network effects that privilege interoperable. On the one hand, it has been issuing a large number of dubious patents over the past twenty years, particularly in the software and electronic commerce space.
Most software patents today are written in functional terms. Thanks to david olson, eric goldman, michael risch, mark lemley, and. An alternative definition for software patents by allison a nd lemley is an invention that is completely embodied in software, even if the claims of the patent refer to a sy stem or article. As if all this were not enough, prof lemley remains a practicing lawyer. Ten things to do about patent holdup of standards and one.
Software patents are crumbling, thanks to the supreme court vox. Forty years ago this week, in the case of parker v. In their book the patent crisis and how the courts can solve it dan burk and mark lemley use a number of sources to arrive at a likely figure of around 18 hours, although it would appear that the time varies significantly depending upon the technology, perhaps between 9 hours and 32 hours burk and lemley, p 23 n 10. Software patents and the return of functional claiming. Software and internet patents with extremely broad claims seem to be everywhere these days. They are worth reading, but his suggestions are minimal.
As discussed by mark lemley, supra, patent law has faced this problem before. I think alice is a real sea change on the patentable subject matter issue. Put another way, patentees claim to own not a particular machine, or even a particular series of steps for achieving a goal, but the goal itself. As many as 55% of all patent defendants and 82% of pae patent troll defendants have been sued on the basis of a software patent share of patent litigation defendants sued on the basis of a software patent. Software patents and the return of functional claiming by. Software patents under the european patent convention. According to lemley, when congress rewrote the patent act in 1952, it. Mark has been named california lawyers attorney of the year twice. In this paper, we examine the implications of some traditional patent law doctrines for innovation in the software industry. We argue that patent law needs some refinement if it is to promote rather than impede the growth of this new market, which is characterized by rapid sequential innovation, reuse and recombination of components, and strong network effects that privilege interoperable components and products. Software patents and the return of functional claiming request pdf. Mark lemley s firm files dj against myriad in northern california promise not to infringe insufficient in anda litigation licensing deals stall in pharmaceutical sector in.
Lemley, patent scope and innovation in the software industry, 89 calif. I appreciate you taking time to chat with me, mark. Indeed, hundreds of thousands of patents cover semiconductor, software, telecommunications, and internet inventions. Uncertainty in patents can be found in the two fundamental dimensions. Patent scope and innovation in the software industry by. He is also the author of seven books, and 119 articles on his subjects of interest. This is one area, however, where it potentially shrunk the body of potential prior art. The patentability of software, computer programs and computerimplemented inventions under the european patent convention is the extent to which subject matter in these fields is patentable under the convention on the grant of european patents of october 5, 1973. In the opposed patent, there was no appeal so that the only reasoned decision is that of the opposition division. He teaches intellectual property, patent law, trademark law, antitrust, the law of.
Mark lemley chats about the alice case of the us supreme court and his firm lex machina, ken is telling us about facebook as a service of process in legal proceedings, rolf tells you about the new fasttrack ctm applications. Intellectual property in the new technological age provides an indepth survey of the rapidly evolving field of intellectual property law. How structural claim limitations can save software patents law360, new york february 9, 2016, 11. Patent scope and innovation in the software industry by mark a. Interview with mark lemley, facebook as a service of. Ive heard a lot of folks talk about how alice doesnt really use the word software so it doesnt. Ten things to do about patent holdup of standards and one not to mark a. Director, program in law, science and technology 2004 present. By contrast, patent law gives strong protection to inventions, forcing competitors to license the patent in order to make any product incorporating the idea. And i wanted to talk to you about software patents in wake of the alice decision. To provide one additional solution, mark lemley has gotten enormous traction arguing for the elimination of functional claiming in software patents i.
Software patents andor software development brooklynworks. His contributions to legal scholarship focus on how the economics and technology of the internet affect patent law, law, and. Patent law has a general set of legal rules to govern the validity and infringement of patents in a wide variety of technologies. Recent posts by simon phipps at infoworld and by mike masnick at techdirt have suggested that it would, calling lemley s proposal the software patent solution that will fix software. Neukom professor of law at stanford university school of law. Lemley3 the software patent cases stand as a testament to the ability of law to adapt to new and innovative concepts, while remaining true to basic principles. The courts have destroyed 11 software patents in the last 3 months and are on track to shatter. Flook, the us supreme court came close to banning software patents. While patent law aims to promote innovation by giving inventors the exclusive right to their inventions.
The modern lanham act and the death of common sense. Volume ii covers law, trademark law, and state intellectual property law protections. He teaches intellectual property, computer and internet law, patent law, and antitrust. The resulting overbroad patents overlap and create patent thickets. There is a large family of granted european patents, the first of which was opposed, and the remainder of which have led peaceful lives since grant.
Tim knight talks to mark lemley about patent law patentology. Software patents and the return of functional claiming1 mark a. At the confluence of these seemingly unrelated developments is a growing frustration on the part of industry with the role of universities as patent owners. The patent and trademark office pto finds itself caught in a vise. The subject also includes the question of whether european patents granted by the european patent office in these fields are regarded as. Software patent lawyers are increasingly writing patent claims in broad functional terms. Battle over secret sales and secret commercialization. While there is some truth to each of these criticisms, the real problem with software patents lies elsewhere. Time and again, when i talk to people in a variety of industries, their view is that. It issues many more patents than its counterparts in europe and japan. Neukom professor of law at stanford law school, where he teaches intellectual property, computer and internet law, patent law, and antitrust. Mark lemley and carl shapiro propose that standardsetting organizations ssos mandate that their members henceforth submit to binding, finaloffer arbitration commonly called baseball arbitration to set fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory frand royalties in licensing disputes concerning standardessential patents seps. This entry was posted on monday, september 22nd, 2014 at 14. Holdup is a primary component of patent litigation and patent licensing today.
He is a preeminent scholar of intellectual property law and an accomplished litigator, and an expert on patents, traded secrets, antitrust, and constitutional law. The case against patent protection for algorithms and other computer programrelated inventions, 39 emory l. Tan mau wus post yesterday on mark lemley s software patents and the return of functional claiming questions whether restricting software claims to disclosed implementations will really make a difference. Lemley, does public use mean the same thing it did last year. Once a patent is issued, functional claims are interpreted in light of the specification by japanese courts, and courts in epc member states, particularly germany. On todays show, we talk with mark lemley, who has some ideas for fixing the patent mess. A sea change for software patent law practice center. Aia expanded the scope of prior art in a number of ways. Theres a lot more beyond the summary and it looks like it took much research to produce, citing the eminent mark lemley. Neukom professor of law at stanford law school and the director of the stanford program in law, science and technology. The subject also includes the question of whether european patents granted by the european patent office in these fields are regarded as valid by national courts. In re cipro, patent misuse, fun stuff in part 1 of my interview with mark lemley we discussed whether the supreme court will take the i4i v. Unfortunately, most of that attention has been devoted to the problem of whether software is or should be patentable subject matter.
He received the california state bars inaugural ip vanguard award. Lemley argued that many software patents use functional claiming, which is patenting a software function basically, the problem that needs to be. Lemley and carl shapiro 77 patent prosecution and patent litigation in the united states. Volume i covers philosophical perspectives, trade secret law, and patent law. Economists mark lemley and carl shapiro argued that the patent granting process should be rethought because there are inherent uncertainties with the system. Reforming software patents santa clara law digital commons. The recent proposed directive on the patentability of computerimplemented inventions takes the european community a step further down the road towards patents for computer software. Cls bank, computer software patents, mark lemley, patent, patent eligibility, patentability, patentability requirements, patents, software patent, software patentability, software patents. Software patents have received a great deal of attention in the academic literature. With a very few exceptions, the statute does not distinguish between different technologies in setting and applying legal standards. A controversial ruling limiting software patents has been making a comeback, timothy b. Lemley is a professor at stanford law school and an expert on software patents. A central fact about the information technology sector is the multiplicity of patents that innovators must deal with. Lex machina was acquired by lexis in december 2015.
The results been a raft of lawsuits against companies making any products in this space. The federal circuit court of appeals added software to the list of patentable inventions in the 1980s and 1990s, and business methods in 1998. Intellectual property expert mark lemley talks about the impact of court rulings on software patents and the tech industrys pressure on congress. Software patents allow individual and companies to claim exclusive rights over software inventions. Universities are engaged in an unprecedented surge in patenting. Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents. Mark has said this to try and get the technology test that the epo uses in place as he knows that it effectively destroys the patent system. The european union, china, and many other countries include some sort of. It is reasonable to expect that one effect of increasing reliance on patent law will be an increase in licenses of both. Patent scope and innovation in the software industry.
996 1476 299 1404 633 1087 305 599 479 1114 850 1078 1419 1261 1351 225 1159 465 303 38 565 1454 50 1498 1201 545 467 439 1099 40 1189 59 883 536 507 884 1279 1346 591 727